Topics / Production
Shooting schedule
47 commentaries in the archive discuss this, with 74 total mentions and 4 sampled passages on this page.
Shape this trail
Narrow the evidence by film decade or commentary type without losing the topic's full archive context.
Showing 2 of 47 commentaries
Clear filtersBy decade
Across the archive
ranked by mentions · click any passage for the moment in the transcript
-
scholar · 1h 32m 2 mentions
The Night of the Hunter (1955)
Terry Sanders, Robert Gitt, F. X. Feeney, Preston Neal Jones
-
And your mother decided it might be best for me to let you know the news. The close-ups of Mitchum were done on a different day than the close-ups of Billy Chapin. When we examined the shooting schedule, it was rather weird the way some scenes were shot over two or three different times in the shooting schedule. They'd wait a few days and go back to it.
26:33 · jump to transcript →
-
restaurant. As the editor, Bob Golden, told me, we ate a lot of food, we drank a lot of booze, but we got the job done that way. I think the whole production of First Unit was just about six weeks, wasn't it? That's right, just about. 35-day shooting schedule, wasn't it? There's a line coming up here. She says, he was looking for love the only way you'd know how.
1:15:53 · jump to transcript →
-
-
-
Alan K. Rode
He would say, unless you're fortunate enough to have the financial wherewithal to replace a bad actor, you're stuck with them for the rest of the schedule. In an interview, Kubrick remarked about hiring the best actors, saying, there's little joy in trying to get a magnificent performance from a student orchestra, unquote. But there are no bad actors in any way, shape, or form in The Killing. The cast is absolutely brilliant.
3:10 · jump to transcript →
-
Alan K. Rode
Jim Harris knew that they couldn't make a movie of any quality for $200,000, so he scraped up another $130,000 from his own savings and borrowed the rest from his father. So the budget for the killing was $330,000 with a 28-day shooting schedule. What's interesting is Variety ran an August 3, 1955 squib claiming that United Artists agreed to finance the entire picture for $600,000, a story that is false.
44:33 · jump to transcript →
-
Related topics
Other topics that frequently come up in the same commentaries.